Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Naomi Rudo's avatar

I support you with contributions to NRDC and letter writing for their campaigns👍

Wes Flint's avatar

It's interesting that so many seem to think the national monuments are "protection" of these places. The national monument designations were the beginning of the end for these places. As soon as they hit the map, the looting by tourists increased exponentially, and the new infrastructure needed stripped away their prior character. Now, the place is loaded with tourists, human waste, infrastructure, and road grading operations that make tarmac look rough. They're now just being mined by social media influencers, CUVs, and tourists and transplants who never would have found them or gone to them without all the canned, infrastructured experiences. I'm not a fan of these places being turned into a political tug of war for politicians I don't like, but the national monuments aren't "protection" by any definition I would use. They're exploitation, infrastructure, booster-marketing beacons, and museumification all in one. Odd to celebrate it as protection, when the current state as a result of so-called protection is the leaching destruction of what once was.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?